[tlhIngan Hol] Sao without the {'e'}

[mayqel qunenoS]

SuStel:
> In addition to the other replies, consider also
> that Qov obviously wanted to include the
> common and classic utterance tlhIngan maH
> in what is supposed to be an important and
> repeated line. It's not just some random
> sentence; it's a slogan.

So, would you say that the following:

{latlh be' vImuSHa. DaSov}
I love another woman. You know it.

Is grammatically wrong and should not be used, or it is grammatically
correct but for the reasons already stated in this thread, the {latlh be'
vImuSHa'. 'e' DaSov} is better ?

mayqel

On Sep 27, 2017 16:27, "SuStel" <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 9/27/2017 4:26 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>
> At another thread we accepted the following as being correct:
>
> {tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}
> we are klingons. may it continue.
>
> And the way I understand the above sentence, it goes "may it continue.
> what ? the fact that we are klingons".
>
> Lets assume now that I write the following:
>
> {latlh be' vImuSHa'. 'e' DaSov}
> I love another woman. You know that.
>
> Based on the {tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}, why couldn't I write too:
>
> {latlh be' vImuSHa. DaSov}
> I love another woman. You know it.
>
> And be equally correct ? Do I necessarily need to place the {'e'} before
> the {DaSov} ?
>
> In addition to the other replies, consider also that Qov obviously wanted
> to include the common and classic utterance *tlhIngan maH* in what is
> supposed to be an important and repeated line. It's not just some random
> sentence; it's a slogan.
>
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170927/55de8d0d/attachment-0016.htm>