[tlhIngan Hol] Two {-'e'}'s in a pronoun sentence.

[mayqel qunenoS]

On Sep 12, 2017 5:44 PM, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:

On 12 September 2017 at 16:22, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> If we write a sentence as "a is b" we need to place the {'e'} on b. So we
> need to write {b 'oH a'e'}.
>
> If we wanted to stress the b, could we place an {-'e'} there too ? Could
we
> write {b'e' 'oH a'e'} ?

What do you think? Why or why not?


Since the {b 'oH a'e'} translates to "as for a it is b", and since the
emphatic {-'e'}, essentially describes the emphasis on the voice of the
speaker, then I would say that yes, we could have an emphatic {-'e'} on the
b.

{nepwI''e' chaH verengan'e'}
as for the ferengi, they are LIARS


> Lets say we write {b 'oHbogh a'e'}; and we want the b to be the subject
of a
> larger sentence. Could we write {yadda yadda yadda b'e' 'oHbogh a'e'} ?
But
> if we could indeed do something like this, wouldn't there be confusion
with
> regards to which one of the two (a or b) is the subject ?

Can you give me an example of {b 'oHbogh a'e'} where b is the subject
of a larger sentence?


{nutojta' nepwI''e' chaHbogh verengan'e'}
the liars which are the ferengi deceived us

I think that the klingon sentence is correct, though I am not quite certain
as far as the english translation is concerned.

qunnoq
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170912/22c4621a/attachment-0016.htm>