[tlhIngan Hol] Sao without the {'e'}

[De'vID]

On 27 September 2017 at 10:26, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> At another thread we accepted the following as being correct:
>
> {tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}
> we are klingons. may it continue.
>
> And the way I understand the above sentence, it goes "may it continue.
> what ? the fact that we are klingons".
>
> Lets assume now that I write the following:
>
> {latlh be' vImuSHa'. 'e' DaSov}
> I love another woman. You know that.
>
> Based on the {tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}, why couldn't I write too:
>
> {latlh be' vImuSHa. DaSov}
> I love another woman. You know it.
>
> And be equally correct ? Do I necessarily need to place the {'e'} before
> the {DaSov} ?
>

Let me ask you this:
"You know that I love another woman."
"I love another woman. You know it."

Are these English sentences equally correct? It's the same difference.

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170927/b2d58cfb/attachment.htm>