[tlhIngan Hol] male female baby

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 00:33:06 PDT 2017

On 3 October 2017 at 16:42, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 10/3/2017 10:37 AM, Lieven wrote:
> To avoid the problem, I would make this two phrases:
> {ghu vIlegh. loD ghaH.}
> That implies to my mind that the baby is a man. Say this instead: *ghu
> vIlegh; loDHom ghaH.*
Really? {loD} is defined as "male, man". Having stated {ghu vIlegh}, it's
obvious that {loD ghaH} means "he's male". When I read {loDHom ghaH}, it
makes me think the baby isn't really a baby but an older child.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171004/d873c70c/attachment-0005.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list