[tlhIngan Hol] Placement of the adverb

nIqolay Q niqolay0 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 11 07:33:19 PDT 2017

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lieven <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:

> I know that. So my question would be, which is the ovs-construction?
> targh Sop loD = OVS
> 'e' legh be'Hom. = OVS
> so these combined:
> nom targh Sop loD = adverb+OVS
> QIt 'e' legh be'Hom. = adverb+OVS
> nom targh Sop loD QIt 'e' legh be'Hom.
> Right?

Makes sense to me, at least grammatically. (I'm not sure *legh* makes sense
to use with *QIt*, since seeing isn't a process. *lengchoH* would work
though. But that doesn't have anything to do with where the adverbs go.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171011/78451a92/attachment-0005.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list