[tlhIngan Hol] male female baby

Lieven levinius at gmx.de
Tue Oct 3 07:46:36 PDT 2017

On 10/3/2017 10:37 AM, Lieven wrote:
>> To avoid the problem, I would make this two phrases:
>> {ghu vIlegh. loD ghaH.} 

Am 03.10.2017 um 16:42 schrieb SuStel:
> That implies to my mind that the baby is a man. Say this instead: *ghu 
> vIlegh; loDHom ghaH.*

You are definitely right, that's more accurate. I had the same thing in 
mind as well. But then I thought like, hey, I already said it's a BABY. 
No need to mention the {Hom}-part any more.

Lieven L. Litaer
aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany"

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list