[tlhIngan Hol] Source of {magh} v. "indicate, reveal"?

[De'vID]

On Oct 1, 2017 00:50, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:



On 28 September 2017 at 19:06, Steven Boozer <sboozer at uchicago.edu> wrote:

> magh            indicate,  reveal (v)
>

What do you have as the source of this definition? I am trying to verify
this definition.


Anyone? I'm almost convinced that this is an error (or perhaps a trap,
since the TKD definition of {magh} is "betray"). My notes claim it's a
possible typo, with the source as Star Trek: Communicator. However, the
text I have of STC issue #104, which is the only issue I'm aware of where
new vocabulary was revealed, does not have this listed.

What is the origin of this definition?

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171026/ddbbdd97/attachment-0017.htm>