[tlhIngan Hol] law' puS construction with law'

[nIqolay Q]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Steven Boozer <sboozer at uchicago.edu>
wrote:

>
> If mayqel is asking whether {law'} -- or {puS} for that matter -- can be
> the Q element in a {A Q law' B Q puS} ("A is Q-er than B") phrase, then I
> see no reason why not.  You would have to listen very carefully, to be
> sure, but that might appeal to some speakers.


Using the same word twice in a row might seem strange, but I don't think
that that sort of thing is unheard of in natural languages.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171011/1c393c89/attachment-0017.htm>