[tlhIngan Hol] puchpa' vIpernIS

[kechpaja]

I have to basically agree with this. While in theory, the gender-neutral
restroom could just be labeled "restroom", people tend to expect
restrooms to be segregated by gender, and will probably be confused if
it isn't explicitly specified that this particular one is not. 

{Hoch} is probably fine if you're making each sign only one word, but
you might need to do something like {Hoch nuv puchpa'} if you want to
include the "restroom" word, to avoid that "all restrooms"
interpretation. 

 - SapIr

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 06:54:50PM +0000, Steven Boozer wrote:
> {puchpa'} works just fine if they're for just one person, but what if they accommodate several people?
> 
> --Voragh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> On Oct 30, 2017, at 2:35 PM, Michael Roney, Jr. <nahqun at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I've been asked to supply Klingon text to label restrooms at a hotel. 
> > 
> > I presume {loD} and {be'} will suffice, but I figured I'd start a discussion as this list has enjoyed discussing restrooms in the past. 
> > 
> > They also need a label for a gender neutral restroom. 
> > People who use this restroom may object to {loD be' je}. I presume {Hoch} works for this? 
> 
> I think you are overthinking it. Just label it {puchpa'} and be done with it.
> 
> — ghunchu'wI'
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org