[tlhIngan Hol] ngIq clarified

[Felix Malmenbeck]

Well, consider it a self-fulfilling prophecy: If Marc Okrand has specified something, then it's bound to end up on boQwI'. If boQwI' cites Marc Okrand, then boQwI' is accurate.


//loghaD


________________________________
From: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol-bounces at lists.kli.org> on behalf of De'vID <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 11:11
To: tlhIngan-Hol
Subject: Re: [tlhIngan Hol] ngIq clarified


On 20 November 2017 at 12:10, Lieven <levinius at gmx.de<mailto:levinius at gmx.de>> wrote:
Hi,

I had forwarded your questions on {ngIq}, and here is Okrand's answer. Basically, your assumptions were right, but it's good to have this clarified.
----
...

(The description of {ngIq} in boQwI' is pretty good.)

Well, this is awkward. I want to edit this entry to include the new information, but if I do, then it won't be the text that Marc Okrand referred to any more.

For posterity, here is what it currently says:
"This noun indicates that a single thing is being considered apart from others, or that a sequence of identical things is considered one after another. Like {Hoch} and {'op}, it precedes what it modifies."

(The printed qepHom booklet actually includes a screenshot of this text next to Okrand's reference to it, so it's preserved there as well.)

--
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171121/c086b90d/attachment-0017.htm>