[tlhIngan Hol] ngIq clarified

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Tue Nov 21 02:11:57 PST 2017

On 20 November 2017 at 12:10, Lieven <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> I had forwarded your questions on {ngIq}, and here is Okrand's answer.
> Basically, your assumptions were right, but it's good to have this
> clarified.
> ----
> ...
> (The description of {ngIq} in boQwI' is pretty good.)

Well, this is awkward. I want to edit this entry to include the new
information, but if I do, then it won't be the text that Marc Okrand
referred to any more.

For posterity, here is what it currently says:
"This noun indicates that a single thing is being considered apart from
others, or that a sequence of identical things is considered one after
another. Like {Hoch} and {'op}, it precedes what it modifies."

(The printed qepHom booklet actually includes a screenshot of this text
next to Okrand's reference to it, so it's preserved there as well.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171121/ca2c04c1/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list