[tlhIngan Hol] mu' chu' chabal tetlh!

[SuStel]

On 3/25/2017 9:39 AM, Felix Malmenbeck wrote:
>
> == DISCUSSION ONLY ==
>
>
> > We can say *DorDI' Hogh* and we generally accept *taghDI' Hogh,*
>
> > so I'm not devastated by this lack. (I wouldn't mind a verb for/
> /
>
> /> begin [a period of time does this]/.)
>
>
> There is quite a lot of canon support for {tagh} having a dual syntax:
>
>
> *tagh *[event]. = "[Event] begins."
>
> [event] *tagh* [agent]. = "[Agent] starts [event]."
>

I'm not referring to dual syntax; I mean *tagh* is glossed /begin a 
process, initiate,/ which might suggest that it refers only to processes 
or events, not to time periods. All of the examples of *tagh* you 
provided refer to events or processes, except possibly *tagh 
HarghchuqmeH poH,* which is a time period defined by an event. The 
question is, does a week "start a process, initiate"?

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170325/74840fca/attachment.htm>