[tlhIngan Hol] mej

[SuStel]

On 7/14/2017 4:12 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> On another thread I noticed that both qurgh and lieven wrote:
>
> qurgh:
> > tetlhvam mejpu'.
> lieven:
> > tetlhvam mejta'chugh
>
> I can understand that these obviously mean "this list she left", and 
> "if she has left this list" respectively.
>
> But just to make certain, I neen to ask: Couldn't we also write 
> {tetlhvamvo' mejpu'} and {tetlhvamvo' mejta'chugh} ?

This is basically the "verbs of motion" argument all over again, only 
this time the verb's object contains an inherent "away from" meaning. I 
see no problem with it.

Apparently, Okrand has never used an object with *mej,* so it's 
difficult to know for sure.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170714/380f4dda/attachment-0016.htm>