[tlhIngan Hol] adjectives bearing the {-be'}

[mayqel qunenoS]

De'vID:
> Be careful what you put in quotation marks. The quote from {boQwI'}
> starts from "can".

I saw that when I was writing the original post, but I chose to
include the "the {-be'}" in the quotation for reasons of clarity,
because after all it doesn't alter the meaning.

De'vID:
> The entries in {boQwI'} are annotated with sources, and I'd rather you
> quoted the sources directly instead. {boQwI'} is not meant to replace
> these sources, only help you find them more quickly.

Indeed you're right, and since we have discussed this in the past, I
try to quote the original sources. But in the case of this thread, I
couldn't find in the tkd the part which wrote, that the {-be'} can be
placed to verbs used as adjectives.

mayqel

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:18 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 July 2017 at 15:03, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I know that we aren't supposed to write "I read (whatever) at boQwI'", but I
>> have to write it, because there I read that..
>>
>> "the {-be'} can be applied to verbs used as adjectives".
>
> Be careful what you put in quotation marks. The quote from {boQwI'}
> starts from "can".
>
> The entries in {boQwI'} are annotated with sources, and I'd rather you
> quoted the sources directly instead. {boQwI'} is not meant to replace
> these sources, only help you find them more quickly.
>
> --
> De'vID
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org