[tlhIngan Hol] Interesting time stamp

Steven Boozer sboozer at uchicago.edu
Thu Jan 5 10:06:16 PST 2017

There’s a similar use of {nungbogh} in the confusing “Message to Kronos”:

poH tuj bI'reS nungbogh wa' jaj qeylIS DIS chorghvatlh loSmaH jav qaStaHvIS. [sic]
In the days that follow the summer solstice in the Year of Kahless 846.     ('U'-MTK)

There’s a usage note from qep’a’ 2015 which may be relevant:

   When asked about navigating lists or events, [Maltz] gave us {vorgh} “be
   previous” (opposite of {veb} “be next)”.  Can also use {nungbogh} ({nung”
   “precede”) …

{vorgh} was used in the NASM tour (North American X-15):

muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey
 'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh.


On Behalf Of Brian Cote

I should have included the original text.

This is what Kotar and Molor
Have said to Kahless
In the hours before battle.

I would have assumed a {qaStaHvIS} construction here.

On Thursday, January 5, 2017, <sustel at trimboli.name<mailto:sustel at trimboli.name>> wrote:
Indeed. Is it an emphasized time stamp? Is it a topic? Is it both?

From: Brian Cote<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wearetheinformation00 at gmail.com');>

No big question here, but I came across this time stamp in the paq'batlh and found it very interesting.
paq'raD 14:19-21
 may' lunungbogh repmey'e'
qeylISvaD mu'meyvam
ja'ta' molor qotar je

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170105/f7ec110a/attachment-0005.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list