[tlhIngan Hol] Interesting time stamp

[SuStel]

This still makes sense. If it is a time stamp, saying *may' lunungbogh 
repmey**'e'* is identifying which hours are the time context of the main 
action (the telling). This is still of the point-to-it-on-a-timeline 
variety.

You /could/ use *qaStaHvIS,* but that probably wouldn't have met the 
constraints of the poetic form.


On 1/5/2017 12:38 PM, Brian Cote wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> I should have included the original text.
>
> This is what Kotar and Molor
> Have said to Kahless
> In the hours before battle.
>
> I would have assumed a {qaStaHvIS} construction here.
>
> QImSIr
>
> On Thursday, January 5, 2017, <sustel at trimboli.name 
> <mailto:sustel at trimboli.name>> wrote:
>
>     Indeed. Is it an emphasized time stamp? Is it a topic? Is it both?
>
>     Notice also the evidence that the object of *ja’ *is the thing
>     said and not the person it's said to.
>
>     -- 
>     SuStel
>     http://trimboli.name
>
>     *From: *Brian Cote
>     <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wearetheinformation00 at gmail.com');>
>     *Sent: *Wednesday, January 4, 2017 8:04 PM
>     *To: *tlhingan-hol at kli.org
>     <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tlhingan-hol at kli.org');>
>     *Subject: *[tlhIngan Hol] Interesting time stamp
>
>     No big question here, but I came across this time stamp in the
>     paq'batlh and found it very interesting.
>
>     paq'raD 14:19-21
>
>     may' lunungbogh repmey'e'
>
>     qeylISvaD mu'meyvam
>
>     ja'ta' molor qotar je
>
>     QImSIr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org


-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170105/46a0ec30/attachment-0017.htm>