[tlhIngan Hol] Rendered fat

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Thu Feb 23 03:51:02 PST 2017

On 18 February 2017 at 05:24, Ed Bailey <bellerophon.modeler at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, boy, the {-lu'} plus {-wI'} thing again! I so wish MO would finally rule
> on this, since it's immediately obvious to some this combination nominalizes
> the same way as "-ee" in "employee," but others regard the construction as
> grammatical gibberish, and they seem to have convinced most to avoid using
> it.

Count me among those who think it's gibberish. I don't see how it's
immediately obvious that a suffix which indicates "no subject" and a
suffix which turns a verb into its subject can be compatible.


More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list