[tlhIngan Hol] Interrogation words and type 5 noun suffixes

Aurélie Demonchaux demonchaux.aurelie at gmail.com
Sun Dec 3 11:12:17 PST 2017

Thank you all for your replies - all duly noted! :)

And yes, I don't think it would make sense in any case to have other types
of suffixes on 'Iv and nuq than type 5.

2017-12-03 1:07 GMT+01:00 SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name>:

> On 12/2/2017 5:18 PM, nIqolay Q wrote:
> I don't believe there are examples of {'Iv} or {nuq} being used with
> {-vaD} and {-mo'}. {​nuqDaq​} already provides a precedent for type 5
> suffixes on question pronouns, though, and there's no rule explicitly
> preventing using other type 5s on {'Iv} and {nuq}. {nuqvaD} and {'Ivmo'}
> and so on all make clear sense semantically. You're probably fine to use
> them.
> But we do have a canon example of *nuq'e' *(*Sojvetlh 'oH nuq'e'* from *Power
> Klingon*), which further supports the idea that you can put noun suffixes
> on these words. (My guess is that only type 5 suffixes would be allowed.)
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171203/7a0cbd32/attachment-0004.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list