[tlhIngan Hol] law' puS construction with verbs carrying suffixes

[De'vID]

On Dec 5, 2017 16:05, "Steven Boozer" <sboozer at uchicago.edu> wrote:

We’ve seen one example of this in the article about variants of the {law’ /
puS} formula nIqolay Q referred to:



*  QuchlIj vIl law'be' QuchwIj vIl puSbe'*

   your forehead isn't ridgier than my forehead. (HQ 13.1:10)



Note that {-be’} appears on both {law’} and {puS}.



That's not an example of what he was asking for. He would want the {-be'}
on {vIl} above.


On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 8:31 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

At another thread, I wrote the sentence:



{tlhIngan mu'tlheghvam tIqbe' law' DIvI' Hol 'elaDya' Hol qoj mu'tlhegh
tIqbe' puS}



With the intented meaning "this klingon sentence isn't longer than the
greek and/or english sentence".



I would like to ask whether the {tIqbe'} is an acceptable verb to be placed
in the slot of the law' puS construction.



Can we use there a verb carrying suffixes ?


-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20171206/e9ad764c/attachment-0017.htm>