[tlhIngan Hol] Is Star Trek: Discovery a new canon category?

Lieven levinius at gmx.de
Thu Aug 10 22:51:59 PDT 2017

Am 11.08.2017 um 04:28 schrieb nIqolay Q:
> One of the major differences between Discovery and Klingon Hamlet is 
> that Discovery is going to be Actual Star Trek Canon.

There's the point: it's "Star Trek" canon, but still not pour Okrandian 
canon. Remember all the gibberish we'se seen on Deep Space nine? That 
certainly is canon, but wo don't even understand a word from it.

Turning this around, did you know that the Star Trek wiki Memory Alpha 
does NOT consider {tlhIngan Hol} as canon? They regard only things seen 
on screen, so the books which we highly praise are non existent for them.

Although I would love to see all Discovery phrases as being (our) canon, 
I must agree that these must be considered as a secondary work like 
Hamlet etc. -- at least until Marc Okrand puts his name under it 
confirming that he has checked and approved all of them.

Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/IsDiscoveryCanon ?

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list