[tlhIngan Hol] -meH meq, and paq'batlh

[Anthony Appleyard]

DaH naDev jIHtaHbogh meq Saja'
qamchIyDaq 'uQ'a'
 
naDev may mean:-
- N:[here|hereabouts]
 jIHtaHbogh may mean:-
- V:monitor* VS7:continuous VS9:which_rel
- P:[I|me] VS7:continuous VS9:which_rel
- P:[I|me] V:[continue*|go_on*|endure*|survive=|be_at_negative_angle] VS9:which_rel
 meq may mean:-
- V:reason
- N:[motive=|reason]
 Saja' may mean:-
- PP:I/you_pl V:[tell|report]
"I tell you why I am here."
qamchIyDaq may mean:-
'uQ'a' may mean:-
"Banquet at qamchIy"
- N:[banquet|feast]=
- N:dinner NS1:augmentative
----Original message----
>From : netzakh at yahoo.com
Date : 30/08/2017 - 23:34 (GMTST)
To : tlhingan-hol at lists.kli.org
Subject : [tlhIngan Hol] -meH meq, and paq'batlh
I would add that there is a sentence in paq'batlh:
DaH naDev jIHtaHbogh meq Saja'
(interestingly, in {qamchIyDaq 'uQ'a'})
Before the qep'a', I suggested (apparently, on FB) that Maltz comments on the grammar of this sentence; hopefully, more light will be shed at the upcoming qepHom'a'.
I am also quite interested in which nouns can serve as head nouns of a {-bogh} clause when the clause relates to its own entirety rather than to its subject or object (poH? ngoD/ghu'? Daq? nger/qech?). 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170831/655b8ed8/attachment-0035.htm>