[tlhIngan Hol] use of {'el} with {-moH}

[mayqel qunenoS]

nIqolay Q:
> {pa'Daq dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH}
jIH:
> What is the {mo'} ?

Oh sorry; forget I asked. Obviously you were translating voragh's sentence;
I thought you were translating mine..

qunnoq

On Aug 21, 2017 7:43 PM, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> nIqolay Q:
> > {pa'Daq dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH}
>
> What is the {mo'} ?
>
> qunnoq
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer at uchicago.edu>
> wrote:
> > I freely admit that my example is wrong… that’s why I suggested someone
> else
> > explain the subtleties of {‘elmoH} – which are frequently discussed on
> this
> > list.  I added an unnecessary comma merely to separate the two parts of
> the
> > sentence, but brackets would have done as well.  ({pa’} is probably not
> the
> > best example as it means both “room” and “there(abouts)”, the latter
> never
> > taking {-Daq}.)
> >
> >
> >
> > --Voragh
> >
> >
> >
> > From: tlhIngan-Hol [mailto:tlhingan-hol-bounces at lists.kli.org] On
> Behalf Of
> > nIqolay Q
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > So, the following sentence which voragh wrote:
> >
> > voragh:
> >> pa'Daq mo’ DOG lu'elmoH
> >> in the room, they caused the dog to enter the cage
> >
> > Is wrong, and should be {pa'Daq, dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH} ?
> >
> >
> >
> > If I'm correct about the {-moH/-vaD} thing (and I like to think that I
> am,
> > though Voragh has far more canon knowledge than I do), then yes, his
> example
> > was wrong, and {pa'Daq dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH} would be correct. (The comma
> is
> > probably unnecessary.)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> > tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> > http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170821/6fcd0f4c/attachment-0017.htm>