[tlhIngan Hol] Accord and pIm

[mayqel qunenoS]

SuStel:
> Actually, it's "the prefix must agree with the subject and
> object of the verb." You set the prefix according to the
> subject and object, not the other way around

Could you write an example of a sentence, which violates the accord rule ?

qunnoq

On Aug 26, 2017 14:54, "SuStel" <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 8/26/2017 6:18 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>
> If we write {mapIm maH chaH je} for "we are different we and them".
>
> Is this grammatically correct, or is does it violate the accord rule,
> which as I understand it says "the subject must agree with the prefix of
> the verb" ?
>
> Actually, it's "the prefix must agree with the subject and object of the
> verb." You set the prefix according to the subject and object, not the
> other way around.
>
> *maH chaH je* is probably a kind of *maH,* so I would expect your
> sentence to be correct.
>
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170826/89846d5c/attachment-0016.htm>