[tlhIngan Hol] use of {'el} with {-moH}

[mayqel qunenoS]

nIqolay Q:
> {pa'Daq dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH}

What is the {mo'} ?

qunnoq

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer at uchicago.edu> wrote:
> I freely admit that my example is wrong… that’s why I suggested someone else
> explain the subtleties of {‘elmoH} – which are frequently discussed on this
> list.  I added an unnecessary comma merely to separate the two parts of the
> sentence, but brackets would have done as well.  ({pa’} is probably not the
> best example as it means both “room” and “there(abouts)”, the latter never
> taking {-Daq}.)
>
>
>
> --Voragh
>
>
>
> From: tlhIngan-Hol [mailto:tlhingan-hol-bounces at lists.kli.org] On Behalf Of
> nIqolay Q
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, the following sentence which voragh wrote:
>
> voragh:
>> pa'Daq mo’ DOG lu'elmoH
>> in the room, they caused the dog to enter the cage
>
> Is wrong, and should be {pa'Daq, dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH} ?
>
>
>
> If I'm correct about the {-moH/-vaD} thing (and I like to think that I am,
> though Voragh has far more canon knowledge than I do), then yes, his example
> was wrong, and {pa'Daq dogvaD mo' lu'elmoH} would be correct. (The comma is
> probably unnecessary.)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>