[tlhIngan Hol] Is Star Trek: Discovery a new canon category?

[mayqel qunenoS]

Unless a sentence comes from 'oqranD, then it isn't canon.

I don't care if a friend of maltz wrote it, I don't care if the rest
of the community considers this friend of maltz an expert;  I don't
care if kahless himself said it, if it isn't from 'oqranD it isn't
canon. Even if God himself wrote it and told me "mayqel this is
canon", I would not accept it.

Sometime in the past, when I was writing in english and my words
-according to an expert here-, didn't concern klingon, he wrote:

"The hundreds of people on this list, didn't join in order to read
your (whatever it was I was writing about)".

So, rephrasing his warm and kind words, I will say that:

"The hundreds of people on this list didn't join in order to learn a
friend of maltz's klingon; they joined to learn okrandian klingon".

And something else, because there is here an obvious confusion with
regards to who-is-who..

Expert: Someone who knows everything and is able to provide correct
and valid answers, in accordance to THE CANON WHICH ONLY OKRAND
CREATES.

So, unless 'oqranD says that he read/wrote/approved each and every
klingon sentence and translation of it, I refuse to accept it as
canon.

qunnoq

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Lieven <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 11.08.2017 um 07:51 schrieb Lieven:
>>
>> There's the point: it's "Star Trek" canon, but still not pour Okrandian
>> canon.
>
>
> No confusion intended: I mean "OUR Okrandian canon".
>
> DopDaq qul yIchenmoH ghobDI' ghu.
>
> --
> Lieven L. Litaer
> aka Quvar valer 'utlh
> Grammarian of the KLI
> http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
> http://www.klingonwiki.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org