[tlhIngan Hol] Is Star Trek: Discovery a new canon category?
Lieven
levinius at gmx.de
Thu Aug 10 22:51:59 PDT 2017
Am 11.08.2017 um 04:28 schrieb nIqolay Q:
> One of the major differences between Discovery and Klingon Hamlet is
> that Discovery is going to be Actual Star Trek Canon.
There's the point: it's "Star Trek" canon, but still not pour Okrandian
canon. Remember all the gibberish we'se seen on Deep Space nine? That
certainly is canon, but wo don't even understand a word from it.
Turning this around, did you know that the Star Trek wiki Memory Alpha
does NOT consider {tlhIngan Hol} as canon? They regard only things seen
on screen, so the books which we highly praise are non existent for them.
Although I would love to see all Discovery phrases as being (our) canon,
I must agree that these must be considered as a secondary work like
Hamlet etc. -- at least until Marc Okrand puts his name under it
confirming that he has checked and approved all of them.
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/IsDiscoveryCanon ?
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list