[tlhIngan Hol] qo' qepDaq chaH'a' thlIngan Hol jatlhwI''e'

[mayqel qunenoS]

kechpaja:
> Actually, I should have just left out the {ghaH}.

Really ? We can just write {juHDaq 'Iv ?} for "Who is at the house ?" ? I
thought that the only way of saying it was {juHDaq ghaH 'Iv'e' ?}.

qunnoq

On 10 Aug 2017 7:41 pm, <kechpaja at comcast.net> wrote:

>
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 19:36, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And while you're dropping the {-Daq}, add an {-'e'} on the {'Iv}.
>
>
> Actually, I should have just left out the {ghaH}.
>
> I don't mean for the {-Daq} nouns to be in a noun-noun construction — each
> of them is an independent locative indicating where the action is
> occurring.
>
>
> qunnoq
>
> On 10 Aug 2017 7:34 pm, "Lieven" <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 10.08.2017 um 18:19 schrieb kechpaja at comcast.net:
>>
>>> SuwomI'Daq {Helsinki}Daq qo' qepDaq ghaH 'Iv?
>>>
>>
>> We just had this in a different thread:
>>
>> Drop the -Daq, say:
>> {SuwomIy Helsinki qo' qepDaq ghaH 'Iv}
>>
>> By the way, hte voting for that con was in Klingon:
>> http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/HelsinkiIn2017
>>
>> --
>> Lieven L. Litaer
>> aka Quvar valer 'utlh
>> Grammarian of the KLI
>> http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
>> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20170810/692c23d0/attachment-0016.htm>