[tlhIngan Hol] {-Qo'} and {-taHvIS}

[mayqel qunenoS]

I got confused again; the right construction is

a. {-taHQo'vIS}
or
b. {-Qo'taHvIS} ?

qunnoq
ghogh HablI'wIjvo' vIngeHta'

On 2 Sep 2016 7:56 p.m., "SuStel" <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 9/2/2016 12:28 PM, Steven Boozer wrote:
>
> SuStel also wrote:
>
> > I'm not so sure about *-qu'* because, while grammatically legal, it
> would mean
> * > while CONTINUOUSLY (as opposed to something else),* but every Klingon
> > w*hile* continuous so there is nothing else.
>
> We do have a single example of {-qu’} with {-taHvIS} from Sonnet 116 again:
>
>
>
> *  ghobe'! qarbejbogh DoDvam qontaH 'u'*
>
> *  jevqu'taHvIS muD ral, bejlI' parmaq.*
>
> *  Qombe'! nISbe' jevwI', 'ej not ruS baq.*
>
>   Oh, no! It is an ever-fixed mark.
>
>   That looks on tempests and is never shaken.
>
>
>
> (lit.  “While the violent atmosphere storms, love still watches”)
>
>
> I was referring to the possibility of *-taHqu'vIS,* which does not appear.
>
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20160902/182f1721/attachment.htm>