[tlhIngan Hol] Vanitas Vanitatum et Omnia Vanitas

nIqolay Q niqolay0 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 7 16:50:41 PDT 2016

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Alan Anderson <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:06 PM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> > ghunchu'wI':
> >> {ret} alone, without being preceded by an actual specifier of a time
> >> period, is very odd.
> >
> > I know. Because of that reason in the original sentence I wrote {'op
> ret}.
> Do you understand the sentence you quoted? Do you know what "time period"
> means?
> {'op} just means "some, an unspecified amount". It isn't a time period
> like {rep} or {Hogh}. {'op ret} "some ago" is not a complete idea.

I think you might be out of the loop a bit. At the latest qep'a', MO
explicitly gave examples that {'op ret} and {'op pIq} were used for "at
some time in the past/future". It's the first image here:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161007/1c5bfa91/attachment-0004.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list