[tlhIngan Hol] The concept of "one/each/every time"

[mayqel qunenoS]

SuStel:
>  If you can't put *reH *in its place and get
> exactly the same meaning (with altered
> emphasis), you're not using it right.

Interesting point.

However, because I fear we're being slowly led astray from the original
subject (of this thread), I would like to say that I'm not searching for a
way to say something like "each dog I tickle bites me".

I'm (was) searching for a way to say "every time I tickle a dog, he bites
me".

Obviously {Hochlogh} can work perfectly for situations like the last one.

qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 31 Oct 2016 4:16 pm, "SuStel" <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 10/31/2016 9:50 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>
> However, as lieven pointed out, if we analyze {Hochlogh} we will see that
> it possesses {Hoch} and {-logh}, which brings its "literal" meaning awfully
> close (in a good way), to "each/every time".
>
> So, why not use it in order to describe the "each time" concept ?
>
>
> *-logh* doesn't mean "times"; it turns the number it's attached to into
> an adverbial meaning how many times something happens. *Hochlogh* refers
> to the number of times something happens (all the times!), not each
> individual instance. If you can't put *reH *in its place and get exactly
> the same meaning (with altered emphasis), you're not using it right.
>
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161031/08a19d88/attachment-0017.htm>