[tlhIngan Hol] Vanitas Vanitatum et Omnia Vanitas

[mayqel qunenoS]

ghunchu'wI':
> You aren't counting "one" of anything

You're wrong. The original sentence was {nuvpu'vam Hoch wa'}. It is obvious
that the reference is made to "each one" of the group of people, the mail
is all about.

qunnoH
ghogh HablI'wIjvo' vIngeHta'

On 8 Oct 2016 10:12 a.m., "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> ghunchu'wI'
> > Do you understand the sentence you quoted?
> > Do you know what "time period" means
>
> What I do understand, is that numerous times on this list the {'op ret}
> has been used without anyone objecting.
>
> So, lets agree to disagree on this one.
>
> qunnoH
> ghogh HablI'wIjvo' vIngeHta'
>
> On 8 Oct 2016 7:03 a.m., "nIqolay Q" <niqolay0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Alan Anderson <qunchuy at alcaco.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:50 PM, nIqolay Q <niqolay0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> {'op} just means "some, an unspecified amount". It isn't a time period
>>> >> like {rep} or {Hogh}. {'op ret} "some ago" is not a complete idea.
>>> >
>>> > I think you might be out of the loop a bit. At the latest qep'a', MO
>>> > explicitly gave examples that {'op ret} and {'op pIq} were used for
>>> "at some
>>> > time in the past/future". It's the first image here:
>>> > http://www.kli.org/activities/qepmey/qepa-chamah-wejdich/new-words/
>>>
>>> I am very much in the loop. I was there at qep'a', and I have a copy
>>> of the booklet from which those images were produced. I read that part
>>> as saying that {pa'logh} and {tuch} are the preferred terms, in
>>> contrast to {'op ret} and {'op pIq}. That is why I called the {'op
>>> ret} phrase "odd".
>>>
>>> I might be misinterpreting it, and I'm trying to reread it without
>>> prejudice.
>>>
>>
>> I interpreted that passage as just clarifying that the new terms for
>> past/future weren't used for time stamps, and that if you wanted a time
>> stamp referencing the general past/future you would use the {'op ret/pIq}
>> phrasing.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
>> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161008/947454ea/attachment-0017.htm>