[tlhIngan Hol] {vaD}ed nouns

Lieven levinius at gmx.de
Tue Nov 1 02:58:37 PDT 2016

Am 01.11.2016 um 09:27 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:
> The answer will probably be no, but what the ghe'tor I'll ask anyway.

bIghelbe'chugh vaj not bISovchoH.

> Can we say:
> HeSwI' leghpu' HungvaD 'obe'
> the organization for security saw the prisoner ?

Clearly not. TKD, chapter 3.4 The noun-noun-construction says "When the 
noun-noun-construction is used, only the second noun can take syntactic 
suffixes (Type 5)".

That is:
{HungvaD 'obe'} NO
{Hung 'obe'vaD} YES

Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list