[tlhIngan Hol] Expressing "one of them"

[mayqel qunenoS]

jIQongtaHvIS, jIvemtaH 'ej jISIvqa'taH..

jIyIttaHvIS jISIvtaH, jISeDtaHvIS jISIvtaH..

qaStaHvIS yInwIj Hoch jISIvtaH, 'ej HeghmeH QongDaqDaq jIHtaHvIS, jISIvtaH..

porghwIjvo' tlheDtaHvIS qa'wIj, jISIvtaH..

Suto'vo'qorDaq pawmeH, SalchoHtaHvIS qa'wIj jISIvtaH, 'ej SaltaHvIS
jISIvqa'taH.

'ach tagha' qeylIS vIqIH, 'ej mughel: lugh'a' {chaH wa'} ?

'ej jIjIvmo', muvaq qeylIS 'ej ghe''orDaq mungeH.

toH, naDev jIHvaD jangmo' pagh, tagha' ghe''orDaq vIjaH.

this is not fair ! hahaha

qunnoH
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 21 Nov 2016 3:14 pm, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> qaStaHvIS tuch Hoch, jISIvtaH: {chaH wa'} vIlo'chugh, "one of them"
> vIDellaH ?
>
> for all eternity, I will be wondering.. is the {chaH wa'} able to describe
> the "one of them" ?
>
> qay'wI'vammo' reH jIghel'eghtaH..
> a great mystery indeed..
>
> qunnoH
> ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
>
> On 20 Nov 2016 7:44 pm, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Would you accept {chaH wa' jIHbe'} for "I am not one of them" ?
>>
>> qunnoH
>> ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161121/60045f4c/attachment-0003.htm>