[tlhIngan Hol] Adverbs with {-qu'}

[mayqel qunenoS]

SuStel:
> Okrand had recently added
>* -Ha'* to an adverbial for the first time

So, do we consider this to be for us a license to place {-Ha'}, to
whichever adverbs we wish ?

And where do we draw the line ? Why stop at the {-Ha'}, and not continue to
other rovers as well ?

If someone writes something which 'oqranD never wrote, we say "don't do it,
it has no precedent". but if there is a precedent, why not act upon it ?

qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 30 Nov 2016 4:18 pm, "SuStel" <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:

On 11/30/2016 9:14 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:

Are there canon examples, with adverbs bearing the {-qu'} ?

I know that at some adverbs we can place the {-Ha'}; but can we place the
{-qu'} ?


No, no examples. I remember at a *qep'a'* one year someone pointing out
that Okrand had recently added *-Ha'* to an adverbial for the first time,
and that this was novel to us. He seemed surprised that we thought you
couldn't do that.

-- 
SuStelhttp://trimboli.name


_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161130/88272fad/attachment-0016.htm>