[tlhIngan Hol] {vaD}ed nouns
Lieven
levinius at gmx.de
Tue Nov 1 02:58:37 PDT 2016
Am 01.11.2016 um 09:27 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:
> The answer will probably be no, but what the ghe'tor I'll ask anyway.
bIghelbe'chugh vaj not bISovchoH.
> Can we say:
>
> HeSwI' leghpu' HungvaD 'obe'
> the organization for security saw the prisoner ?
Clearly not. TKD, chapter 3.4 The noun-noun-construction says "When the
noun-noun-construction is used, only the second noun can take syntactic
suffixes (Type 5)".
That is:
{HungvaD 'obe'} NO
{Hung 'obe'vaD} YES
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list