[tlhIngan Hol] A disturbing realization

[mayqel qunenoS]

here is my problem..

first voragh writes:
> (MO via ghunchu'wI', 7/27/2009):  There are names [..]

then he changes paragraph and continues:
> E.g.  'at, bay, chay, Day, 'et, ghay ... 'ut, way, yay, qaghwI' [..]

without specifying if this sentence is a continuation of okrand's relayed words.

and the icing on the cake comes when he writes:
> To refer to an alphabet, syllabary, etc., we might say *{ngutlhghom}..

Okrand's relayed words have the date of 7/27/2009; however the
{ngutlh} was revealed on the previous qepHom. So, how is it possible
for the part of voragh's post, which contains the {ngutlh}, to be a
relayed message from okrand which took place on 2009 ?

qunnoq jan puqloD

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:44 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 8:17 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>>
>>
>> SuStel:
>> > As Voragh said, it is a pronouncement by
>> > Okrand as relayed by ghunchu'wI'.
>>
>> I still don't understand;
>>
>> The part from {at, bay..} to "..spectrum, (musical) scale", was said by
>> okrand and relayed by ghunchu'wI, or was it written by voragh in order to
>> explain the previous quote from okrand (which was relayed by ghunchu'wI') ?
>>
>
> The former. The words are ghunchu'wI''s; the canon is Okrand's. Voragh
> copied and pasted.
>
>
> --
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org