[tlhIngan Hol] Dop Hurgh lo'laHghach

[mayqel qunenoS]

ok, thanks; however another question came to mind:

I understand why the {Dochmey mI'} is wrong/inappropriate for the
intented meaning. But what if I wrote {Dochmey HochHom} for "almost
all of the things" ? In this example, is the {HochHom} the head noun
too ?

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:46 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 11/8/2016 9:39 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>
> SuStel:
>> The phrase Dochmey mI' is talking about
>> numbers, not things;mI' is the head noun.
>
> Impressive analysis. I could have never thought that something like this is
> happening.
>
> However I need to ask you:
>
> Does this mean that in any noun-noun construction, the head noun is the
> second one ?
>
>
> It's always the last one. (Noun-noun constructions can be strung together;
> e.g. tlhIngan Hol yejHaD is a kind of yejHaD; not a kind of tlhIngan or a
> kind of Hol.)
>
> --
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>