[tlhIngan Hol] A thought on the irrealis construction

[Lieven]

Am 07.11.2016 um 10:31 schrieb De'vID:
> It would be very weird, at this point, to get any more (let's say,
> "modern {ta' Hol}") suffixes, considering the volume of canon we have.
> What are the chances that a commonplace suffix would fail to appear in
> important Klingon works such as {paq'batlh} and {Hamlet}?

Yes, true, but on the other hand - think of how many words were 
"discovered" after the translation of Hamlet!

They didn't even have a word for "sun" :-)

-- 
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net