[tlhIngan Hol] Can I go around the SAO, this way ?

[mayqel qunenoS]

> But the trick is
> that the example you gave is grammatically correct yet isn't
> respecting the tools of Klingon grammar

I didn't know that, thanks !

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Alan Anderson <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:03 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, let me ask a trick question : Do you accept exclamations with no
>> overt subject ? For example :
>>
>> teH ! wa'Hu' Ha'DIbaH vISopta'.
>> it is true ! yesterday I ate an animal.
>
> Sentences with unstated, implicit subjects are fine. But the trick is
> that the example you gave is grammatically correct yet isn't
> respecting the tools of Klingon grammar. If you want to express
> certainty, use the Type 6 verb suffix {-bej}.
>
> wa'Hu' Ha'DIbaH vISopbejta'.
>
> If I were to do it your way, I'd actually put the {teH} sentence last.
> {vISopta'. teH!} "I did eat it. It's true!"
> However, I don't think there's anything particularly hard to believe
> about eating meat. :-P
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org