[tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good captain

[mayqel qunenoS]

you know..

there are some things in klingon which do make sense, and I understand
their necessity.

on the other hand, there are others which I can't understand why they
have to be this way ; why would it hurt to actually have QAO ? why
would it hurt to have an aspect suffix after the {'e'} in a SAO ? why
{lu'} and {laH}, or {qa'} and {choH}, are mutually exclusive ?

can't "someone" be "able to" at the same time ? or can't I "start"
doing something "again" ?

but as in life there are no answers to the questions that really
matter (why are we born, what happens after death etc), in tlhIngan
Hol too, there are no answers to the questions that really matter
either..

yan Doq qunnoq

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Lieven <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 13.07.2016 um 14:44 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:
>>
>> but this is right ?
>>
>> [chay' veSDuj'a' vIghajlaH?] - DaH 'e' boyajchoH
>
>
> No, since Klingon is a spoken language, punctuation does not change anything
> in the meaning. It's still wrong.
>
>
>
> --
> Lieven L. Litaer
> aka Quvar valer 'utlh
> Grammarian of the KLI
> http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
> http://www.klingonwiki.net
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org