[tlhIngan Hol] Fwd: RE: The book of our good captain

[SuStel]

Accidentally sent this off-list.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	RE: [tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good captain
Date: 	Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:35:48 -0400
From: 	SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name>
To: 	Lieven <levinius at gmx.de>



We can’t jump in headlong and blindly accept any QAO without scrutiny, 
but we do have to acknowledge that QAO is not unquestionably illegal.

De’vID’s (I think) question remains unanswered and a good one: if QAO is 
illegal, /why/ is it illegal? It’s a rule we made up ourselves. If we 
discount using question words as relative pronouns, what is the 
justification of preventing questions as the first sentence?

*From: *Lieven <mailto:levinius at gmx.de>
*Sent: *Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:23 PM
*To: *tlhingan-hol at kli.org <mailto:tlhingan-hol at kli.org>
*Subject: *Re: [tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good captain

I would not generalize that QAO is legal just because of this one example.


-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20160713/5f4ca935/attachment-0017.htm>