[tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good captain

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 07:21:26 PDT 2016

On 13 July 2016 at 18:57, Terrence Donnelly
<terrence.donnelly at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Let's not forget the canon construction {HIq Datlhutlh DaneHbogh yIngu'}.

Hold on. That's not actually canon, is it?

What is the head noun of the {-bogh} clause here? Because *that* is
the object of {ngu'}. I don't believe this question is asking the same
thing as {nuq Datlhutlh DaneH}.


More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list