[tlhIngan Hol] Thoughts on {-moH}

[SuStel]

On 12/8/2016 2:10 AM, Lieven wrote:
>
> What do you think about:
> {torghvaD taj'e' matlh nobmoH Qugh}
> having {nob} refer to two differetn objects?

I don't see two objects. I see a beneficiary/indirect object (not an 
object in the Klingon sentence position way), a topic (not an object), 
and *matlh* (an object). I read this sentence as /as for knives, Kruge 
makes Torg give Maltz/ (he is handing Maltz over).

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161208/7547163d/attachment-0017.htm>