[tlhIngan Hol] Is the {telDaq wovmoHwI'} legal

[SuStel]

On 12/5/2016 7:06 AM, Michael Kúnin wrote:
> As mentioned before in this list, it can be analysed as {[telDaq 
> wovmoH]wI'}, so it is perfectly legal.

I don't think you can apply *-wI'* to a multi-word phrase. Anyway, 
Okrand has consistently used *wovmoHwI'* as /light,/ so it seems a fixed 
meaning to me.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161205/8c10871c/attachment-0017.htm>