[tlhIngan Hol] paq'batlh mu'tlhegh

[De'vID]

On Dec 19, 2016 16:25, "Ed Bailey" <bellerophon.modeler at gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:07 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

maj. however, how would you explain tkd's {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'}, and
> in particular the placement of {naDev} after the {jIHtaHbogh} and not
> before it ?
>
>
My explanation is that to expect the {naDev} to be required to precede
{jIHtaHbogh} is an overgeneralization of the rule that places nouns +
{-Daq} and location nouns like {naDev} before the verb.

In the examples from TKD and paq'batlh, {naDev} does follow the verb,


Which example from the paq'batlh?

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161220/6d7fd2f7/attachment-0016.htm>