[tlhIngan Hol] Something on the {vabDot}

[Alan Anderson]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:35 PM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> At this canon sentence:
>
> Qo'noS romuluS je boSuqlaH. vabDot tera' Qejbogh DIvI' ram boSuqlaH.
> kronos, romulus and even the puny federation's precious earth, are all
> up for grabs.
>
> The {vabDot} is referring to the {boSuqlaH}, right ?
>

If {vabDot} is an adverbial, then the English sentence implies that it
applies to {boSuqlaH}.
If {vabDot} is a noun, then it goes with {tera'} in a genitive (noun-noun
"possessive") relationship.

Without more examples or explicit revelation from the language's creator,
we lack certainty.

-- ghunchu'wI'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161208/fa8f7427/attachment-0016.htm>