[tlhIngan Hol] The most beautiful decepticon

[mayqel qunenoS]

De'vID:
> Megatron qam bIngDaq Optimus Prime nach
> chevlu'pu'bogh taptaHvIS, Megatron 'IH law' Hoch Decepticon 'IH puS.

there is something which rubs me the wrong way in this sentence.. lets
analyze it together..

first it says:
{Megatron qam bIngDaq Optimus Prime nach chevlu'pu'bogh taptaHvIS}
under the foot of megatron the head of optimus prime, which someone
had separated, while he was squashing

so, we are left to wonder "who was squashing that head ?" only to read
next the name of "megatron", which simultaneously is the first of the
two nouns in a law'/puS construction.

Is this correct ? Can the subject (if megatron is indeed the subject
of the first sentence), be at the same time the first noun of a
law'/puS construction ?

mayqel jan puqloD


On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:02 PM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> De'vID:
>> Optimus Prime vISaHbe'. Megatron bop
>> mu'tlheghwIj. yIlaDqa'.
>
> teH. QInlIj wa'DIch vIlaDqa'ta' 'ej bIlugh 'e' vItlhoj.
>
> De'vID:
>> Megatron HoS law' Starscream HoS puS.
>
> jIQochbe'.
>
> De'vID:
>>Megatron 'IH law' Starscream 'IH puS.
>
> jIQoch; f-22 mojDI' starscream, ngutlhmey nov ghajmo', 'IHqu'.
>
> jIH:
>> megatron yIvan Hoch !
> De'vID
>> maj.
>
> maQochbe'chu' jupwI' !
>
> qunnoH jan puqloD
> megatron yIvan Hoch ! Qamqa' pumwI' !