[tlhIngan Hol] War related expressions

[mayqel qunenoS]

however, the question now arises:

because {Qap} can take an object, we can say {noH wIQap}. but can the {luj}
take an object as well ? because if it cannot take an object, then we can't
say {noH wIluj}, and we can only say things like {vanDI' noH, maluj}.

so, can the {luj} take an object ?

qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

On 30 Dec 2016 3:11 pm, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30 December 2016 at 13:38, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> > DevID:
> >> {noH QapmeH wo' Qaw'lu'chugh yay chavbe'lu' 'ej wo'
> >> choqmeH may' DoHlu'chugh lujbe'lu'.}
> >
> > the {noH QapmeH} is indeed pretty straightforward for "to win a war", but
> > does the {lujbe'lu'} mean that we can say {noH lujlu'} for {someone lost
> the
> > war} ?
> >
> > also, are the {noH Suv} and {noH ghob} acceptable, for "to fight a war" ?
>
> KGT p.47:
> <Thus, it is possible to say {noH ghob} or {noH Suv}, both meaning
> "He/she fights a war," or {may' ghob} or {may' Suv}, meaning "He/she
> fights a battle," but it is not normally acceptable to say {veS ghob}
> ("He/she fights a warfare") or {vIq Suv} ("He/she fights a combat").>
>
> --
> De'vID
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161230/7ce4d9a6/attachment-0002.htm>