[tlhIngan Hol] be-verbs and the {-wI'}

mayqel qunenoS mihkoun at gmail.com
Tue Dec 27 06:47:51 PST 2016


there is something which I probably understand, but I need to make certain.

lets take a non be-verb:

lotlh = to rebel
lotlhwI' = the rebel

now, lets take a be-verb:

bel = be pleased
belwI' = someone who is pleased

Is my translation of the {belwI'} correct ? I am wondering whether the
addition of the {-wI'} on be-verbs, functions differently from the way it
does on non be-verbs.

qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161227/00289aab/attachment.htm>


More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list