[tlhIngan Hol] be-verbs and the {-wI'}
mayqel qunenoS
mihkoun at gmail.com
Tue Dec 27 06:47:51 PST 2016
there is something which I probably understand, but I need to make certain.
lets take a non be-verb:
lotlh = to rebel
lotlhwI' = the rebel
now, lets take a be-verb:
bel = be pleased
belwI' = someone who is pleased
Is my translation of the {belwI'} correct ? I am wondering whether the
addition of the {-wI'} on be-verbs, functions differently from the way it
does on non be-verbs.
qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20161227/00289aab/attachment.htm>
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list